May 23, 2012, 08:06:22 am
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Affordable health care for all  (Read 910 times)
Ruckus
Tester
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2928



« on: September 11, 2009, 11:29:19 pm »

Time to get off the wall and start fighting you buncha pussies.

For or against and why ?


Logged
stas
BKP Member
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2038



WWW
« Reply #1 on: September 11, 2009, 11:40:37 pm »

For (philosophically)
Logged

Commie don't play dat!

zipfruder
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 396



« Reply #2 on: September 12, 2009, 03:24:09 am »

it should start small, like free emergency care and check-ups.
Logged

Zeradul
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3009


« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2009, 11:15:56 am »

Quote
Affordable health care for all

For or against and why ?

Fuck Yea!  Why the hell would anyone be in favor of expensive health care for all Huh

--------

In other news, slanted poll questions that make the other side sound irrational or unfair before they even respond is a Fox News tactic.  At least you're learning SOMETHING from them, Ruck.... Cheesy

--------

I assume this is the question Ruck was asking.....

For or against any form of socialized health care?
Logged

"If you have the facts on your side, pound the facts. If you have the law on your side, pound the law. If you have neither on your side, pound the table." - old legal aphorism
Ruckus
Tester
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2928



« Reply #4 on: September 14, 2009, 11:53:37 am »

Well Zera without "socialized" or UNIVERSAL health care , all other forms are rather expensive and 'unaffordable' to a vast number of citizens in this country.


But that aside what are your thoughts ?
Logged
Stinger
The Pariah Messiah
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 945


If there's a hell, I'm going there.


WWW
« Reply #5 on: September 14, 2009, 02:38:22 pm »

Single-payer is what the US should have, because it's the only thing that makes sense. The insurance companies need to stop existing.

But that won't happen, because our government is woefully intermingled with the insurance and pharma industries. So we need a "public option," then.

But that looks like it might not happen, because democrats are pussies who can't get anything done even with a historic majority where they should have been able to get anything done.

So really, I get the feeling this whole conversation is a moot point.
Logged


Josh Johnson
joshjohnson@egodriven.net
The "What Men are Really Thinking" Project - A.K.A. the only thing on Egodriven I've paid any attention to whatsoever in years.
"if any of you fuckheads are going to heaven, I'd bet it would be Stinger." - paulsbo
stas
BKP Member
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2038



WWW
« Reply #6 on: September 21, 2009, 06:42:07 pm »

Here is one way to look at it

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/20/health/policy/20view.html?_r=1
Logged

Commie don't play dat!

Ruckus
Tester
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2928



« Reply #7 on: September 21, 2009, 09:39:05 pm »


"N. Gregory Mankiw is a professor of economics at Harvard. He was an adviser to President George W. Bush." 

"Despite all the talk about waste and abuse in our health system (which no doubt exists to some degree)"  Understatement of the year !!

Stas,  Then why are we trying to overhaul this system anyway ?   This guy is saying it's fine like it is .



« Last Edit: September 21, 2009, 09:46:11 pm by Ruckus » Logged
dusty
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3707



« Reply #8 on: September 25, 2009, 11:28:38 pm »

I really have no idea what they are planning to do and if there is a bill already -- I've not read it, but what's wrong with everyone getting free health-care?
Logged
Zeradul
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3009


« Reply #9 on: September 25, 2009, 11:47:07 pm »

Why stop at health care?  Everyone should get free food, all the time.  What's wrong with that?

Plus, the government is known for such wonderful food items like "Government Cheese" !  and the US Public School system's famous "Hot Lunch" !  Note:  a second Milk is 10 cents extra!

Yum.
« Last Edit: September 26, 2009, 12:02:51 am by Zeradul » Logged

"If you have the facts on your side, pound the facts. If you have the law on your side, pound the law. If you have neither on your side, pound the table." - old legal aphorism
Ruckus
Tester
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2928



« Reply #10 on: September 26, 2009, 01:14:51 am »

Logged
dusty
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3707



« Reply #11 on: September 26, 2009, 01:44:17 am »

I really enjoy that, but it does bother me that something that wonderful came out of 4chan.
Logged
Stinger
The Pariah Messiah
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 945


If there's a hell, I'm going there.


WWW
« Reply #12 on: September 26, 2009, 01:50:00 am »

I've seen some seriously wonderful breasts materialize around the intarwebs that had the term "/b/" scrawled across them, so I don't find it that hard to believe.

Good find, Rucky.
Logged


Josh Johnson
joshjohnson@egodriven.net
The "What Men are Really Thinking" Project - A.K.A. the only thing on Egodriven I've paid any attention to whatsoever in years.
"if any of you fuckheads are going to heaven, I'd bet it would be Stinger." - paulsbo
Zeradul
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3009


« Reply #13 on: September 26, 2009, 02:14:44 am »

Funny, yes.  Relevant, not at all.  Nearly everything in that list is a regulation.  And most of those regulations are on private industries.

Regulations, and Certifications can be great!  The US Health care industry is already relentlessly regulated and "certified" by endless government bureaucracies like the FDA and HHS.  If government regulations alone were responsible for quality or price, we wouldn't currently have a problem!
« Last Edit: September 26, 2009, 05:18:29 am by Zeradul » Logged

"If you have the facts on your side, pound the facts. If you have the law on your side, pound the law. If you have neither on your side, pound the table." - old legal aphorism
rue
Tester
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 813



« Reply #14 on: September 26, 2009, 02:18:38 am »

Just a quick hit since it's a pet peeve of mine.  The Federal Reserve Bank is a misleading title.  It isn't a government program.  The President appoints a Board of Governors but the 12 banks within are privately owned.  It has many purposes but in terms of checks and balances its role is to play the private industry's counterpart to the public government's Treasury Department.  

...and time-in.
Logged

n!rue
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNEEXXT!!!

Zeradul
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3009


« Reply #15 on: September 26, 2009, 02:44:16 am »

And because Ruck did ask what my solution to the health care problem is, here goes.

So I recognize we have a serious problem today.  However, the problems we are having are a result of this circular problem:

-> Health care plan purchased
-> Individual has a financial DIS-incentive to get "early detection" treatments
-> Individual eventually gets sick and goes to the hospital
-> Individual diagnosed with more serious condition than if it had been detected early
-> Individual request the best service his/her insurance can afford (because they aren't paying!)
-> Doctors have to hire on average 5 office personnel per doctor MERELY to process insurance payments
-> Doctors and hospitals are allowed to wildly increase their prices over the years because their clientele never cares how much these "serious" treatments cost (because insurance will cover it!)
-> Decades of lack of competition and efficiency have ballooned our prices out of control
-> Insurance companies are forced to charge higher premiums because the average hospital stay in ever increasing in cost.

AND THE CYCLE REPEATS, but with fewer people able to afford health care plans, the health care industry starts to lose some of it's economy of scale, making it even less efficient going forward.

So what is the solution?

As always, the answer is competition.  In Health Care, that means HSA's or "Health Savings Accounts" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_savings_account

In short, "insurance" companies still exist, but they are used more sparingly for the extremely expensive procedures.  Everything else, is paid for by an insurance like savings account, except the individual pays a more direct proportion of the expense, meaning all of a sudden, the individual DOES care if the procedure costs $5,000 total, or $20,000 total.  And before you say that people arriving at an ER aren't ready to price shop, yes that is true, however, how competition works is that it only takes 10% of people looking for the better deal to force competition among all.

When it is YOUR $15,000 at stake I promise you, you will spend a lot of time calling hospitals getting information on exactly what you are getting, and if you need it all.  You are also more likely to get those preventative check-ups.

That's how I view it.  I'll no doubt be asked to explain the problems of government run health care later in the thread.
Logged

"If you have the facts on your side, pound the facts. If you have the law on your side, pound the law. If you have neither on your side, pound the table." - old legal aphorism
Stinger
The Pariah Messiah
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 945


If there's a hell, I'm going there.


WWW
« Reply #16 on: September 26, 2009, 03:18:06 pm »

I think it a bit short-sided to say that having insurance provides a disincentive to get preventative treatment. We're not talking about some tangible item getting insured, we're talking people. People are scared shitless of getting sick. I believe whole-heartedly that the reason so many people wait until it's too late to stop something to get treatment because they DON'T have insurance, and that a trip to the local emergency care center costs $175 (that's true as of 2 weeks ago in Maryland) if you walk out without needing any additional treatment.

If everyone was insured (I really am a fiscal conservative for universal coverage... and I do realize how fucking odd that is) it would remove the disincentive for poor people to go get checked out as soon as they start seeing symptoms. It would prevent a lot of serious illnesses, not a doubt in my mind.

I'm a big fan of the free market, I make my monies in every one I can break into, but I feel it morally wrong to middle-man profit off of peoples health. I really don't see this as a fiscal issue, this is about compassion.

And yes, I've actually said somewhere on this forum "You don't want the government legislating compassion, they suck at it." But I genuinely feel this is the exception to the rule. EVERYONE has a pretty decent chance of getting a serious injury or illness that a great many people literally can't afford to survive while, as you've pointed out, the health care that could save their life costs 3-4 times more than it should due to inflated fees to pay for insurance company profit margins.

The health of a human being is one of the very few things I feel it morally corrupt and bankrupt to make a profit off of middle-manning. The insurance companies need to stop existing. All health care needs to cost whatever it costs in equipment, electricity, expendables and labor. The doctors and assistants who physically work on the process of fixing people should be the only people concerned about making their living off of the sick and dying.

Health insurance companies really are run off of an evil concept. Any "solution" that doesn't involve them being abolished isn't a solution. Yes, universal health care leaves the same task in the hands of the government, but the simplicity of the government not needing to make a profit outweighs the fact that the government sucks at a great many things.

You know the only thing our government is consistently good at? Throwing money at people that it doesn't expect to get back. And frankly, everyone in America getting regular screenings would make it so less people require the most expensive treatments. So not only would it save money by cutting out the massive profits for insurance companies, it would get even cheaper still after several years when people no longer have the financial dis-incentive to get checked out and people stop getting sick from stupid shit.

If I have to give up money to keep alive a bloated behemoth who pissed away every chance at success in his life, I'd rather that engorged beast be a 400 pound McDonald's addict who needs insulin than General Motors. As far as I'm concerned, making sure every man woman and child in America doesn't die from shit we can fix is way more worth my tax dollars than throwing billions at Detroit to discourage them from evolving into a business model that could actually support them. Hands down.

On HSAs: That would be fantastic in a perfect world, Zera, but this is America. We have PE in our school system, but we intentionally teach our people so little about how money works that the idea of doing your own taxes to most people seems legit torture, and the practice of nursing a savings account to health is even more foreign than the concept of keeping to a 2000 calorie diet.

Stupid people can't save money, Zera. Especially lower-class stupid people who don't have much money that they could be saving anyway. I feel that health is simply something everyone is entitled to. Even if they're too stupid to earn it.
Logged


Josh Johnson
joshjohnson@egodriven.net
The "What Men are Really Thinking" Project - A.K.A. the only thing on Egodriven I've paid any attention to whatsoever in years.
"if any of you fuckheads are going to heaven, I'd bet it would be Stinger." - paulsbo
Zeradul
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3009


« Reply #17 on: September 26, 2009, 10:39:49 pm »

I feel it morally wrong to middle-man profit off of peoples health.
Stinger, wow.  Why is profit evil?  The pursuit of profit is this statement:  I can provide you a service, more effectively, and efficiently than my competitor.  You should come to me for your needs, because I am the BEST solution for YOU.  I am working endlessly to remain the BEST option for you, and yes I am profiting, but it is only because I am the MOST FIT, Most IDEAL option for you.

If I have to give up money to keep alive a bloated behemoth who pissed away every chance at success in his life, I'd rather that engorged beast be a 400 pound McDonald's addict who needs insulin than General Motors.
Well, you know I hate the bailouts, but what you're saying here is, "hey, we're totally incompetent with out money here in the US.  Therefore, a reason I personally see as a little bit less incompetent is a great recipient of a free handout!"  What?  One blatant mistake does not justify another.

Stupid people can't save money, Zera. Especially lower-class stupid people who don't have much money that they could be saving anyway.
Ah!!!  An HSA is NOT just a savings account.  It's something that everyone would be required to put money into, just like insurance currently is, however, the big advantages are, that it's completely tax free investment.  It gains interest, it's NOT tied to your job, meaning you can quit, move, etc, without fear of losing your health coverage, and it is YOUR money, so YOU can spend it on whatever health products you want.  There's no punk-ass insurance company telling you what you can't spend it on.  You can even use that account to PAY deductibles towards those massive expenses that you still use insurance for.  Insurance is shockingly cheaper when you're only using it with a high deductible, and covering only the "massive" health care expenses.

And I don't think the average person is stupid.  I mean, if you actually think the average person cannot fend for himself in a most basic way, then how can we possibly hope that equally stupid people thousands of miles away can legislate and make accurate, personal health decisions for everyone?  I fear, "one size fits all" legislation, especially health care!

Here are the problems with government health care as I see it:  (That said, I'm not speaking specifically on Obama's plan, because no matter how competent or rational it is, it will undoubtedly expand over the decades to be something Obama didn't intend, like every government bureaucracy to being an out of control shit show, where the system has broken down and services are almost not existent, and costs are obscene.  Examples: the Military, the DMV, the US Tax Code, etc)

* We can't afford it.  We're now over 10 trillion dollars in debt, and Obama is actually increasing the deficit faster than Bush, which is something I didn't think possible.  He also has not gotten us out of the middle east yet, like he promised.  In fact he recently just passed another "surge"  WTF.

* If the government is paying, then demand will go through the roof, and our system will not be able to handle the load, and the system will start to resort to massive lines like Canada, Europe has.  1 month is a pretty standard wait for anything in those places, and some of the more rare services are 4-6+ month waits.  Many Canadians, fearing for their lives travel across the border to get these scans, when their abdominal pain, (or other terrifying symptom) doesn't go away, because they fear if they wait 6 months for the scan they desperately need, they'd be dead.

* The wait times are so bad in Canada, that "illegal" private clinics and hospitals are opening at an shocking rate.  The government recognizes they are illegal, but since the government system cannot afford to serve everyone, they have no choice but to allow these new hospitals to open.  People gladly pay out of their own pocket for service (even if they've already paid for it through taxes) because they just want to live.

* And here's where it gets un-constitutional.  Once government is paying for every health ailment, then all of a sudden, some "do-gooder" in Congress or the Senate will start trying to pass laws against what we can or cannot DO or EAT because it is TOO unhealthy.  And it won't stop at just banning deep fried food, with government healthcare, here begins the endless barrage of can't do this, can't eat that laws.  Don't brush this off as unlikely, Chicago has already banned multiple types of fried foods, in a misguided attempt to make their city healthier.  Many restaurants of course disregard this legislation, because the fines are small, and they know unconstitutional when they see it, but still.  Giving the federal government one more bullshit policing task.

* This is just one more massive barrier to immigration reform.

* Oh and, we can't afford it.  Even if I'm wrong about all my concerns.  We. Can't. Afford. It.

So those are the major reasons.  I could go into other ones about stifling innovation, and new products, medicines and services.  Also, discouraging young doctors from entering the field because it will now be that much harder to pay off their education bills because the government will limit their wages like Canada and Europe has done.

-----------------

* Oh, and before you say, "hey Europe and Canada have successful systems!  Why can't we?"  That's because those systems rely on the U.S. subsidizing their security.  Our military has been keeping the peace (and kicking wasp-nests) around the world for 60 years and we have allowed nearly all of Europe to reduce their military to a non-existent state.  Same with Canada.  If we were a competent nation, our military (and it's budget) would be 5% of what is currently is today.  We would not have gone into the middle east, and we wouldn't be so obscenely in debt.  Those acts would ALSO have required Europe and Canada to maintain their militaries, and if so, they wouldn't have been able to afford their health care systems.

Lasting World Peace relies on every country having their own fit, and capable military.  With most of the nations of the world being peaceful, this means that when a Saddam for example invades Kuwait, we come together as a world to bitch slap the shit out of him.

-----------------------

As a libertarian, I'm for any law or policy that results in more liberty for every individual.  So, I'm not ruling out some sort of government subsidized health care (especially for 18 and under children - I might even support that today) however, get us out of the middle east, and the 163 other nations we have a "permanent military presence" and reduce the military by 80+%, and lets pay off our debts, and THEN, lets talk about this type of system.

As it stands we're headed off a cliff and we're only mashing the accelerator.  The world will not bear out debts forever.  We MUST get this under control, or we are rapidly accelerating towards a massive economic depression on a global scale.
Logged

"If you have the facts on your side, pound the facts. If you have the law on your side, pound the law. If you have neither on your side, pound the table." - old legal aphorism
Stinger
The Pariah Messiah
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 945


If there's a hell, I'm going there.


WWW
« Reply #18 on: September 27, 2009, 12:07:10 am »

Bah, Zera! "Wow" is right, you should know me better than that! To get "profit is evil" out of what I said is a stretch. I said making a middle-man profit off of ones health care is evil.

Profit is cool, we've been over this. I'm an uber-capitalist. Doctors can make a profit, nurses, hell even the drug companies. This is fine. But when you provide literally zero benefit (as insurance companies work really, really hard to do for their customers), then you don't deserve money.

See, middle-manning profit in and of itself I have no problems with. I do it myself, frequently. I bring someone who wants something to the people who sell that thing, then make a percentage. Fair enough, I performed a service. I introduce the supply to the demand, and I do it over things like better sex guides and car fuel. These things are WAY optional in life, certainly not dire by any stretch.

So lets look at heart surgery. Lets say this guy over here, we'll call him Joe, is going to die if he doesn't get a new heart. I don't know what heart transplants go for these days, so I'm just going to make up some numbers. Lets say for the new heart, the time it takes for the surgeon and crew to put it together, and the electricity and tools needed, the whole thing costs $30,000. Lets take a look at this as if it were one of my deals.

So I know Joe, Joe knows he needs a new heart, and I know the guys who can supply and install it for $30,000. I generally don't middle-man anything that I can't make at least 50% off of, so I tell Joe it costs $60,000. He can't get to these people without me, nor does he even know that if he could it would be half what I quoted him, so he gives me the money and gets his heart surgery, and I pocket $30,000. Are you telling me that wouldn't be an instance of profit being evil?

Obviously that's 20 different kinds of hypothetical, but do you see the correlation I'm making? Health insurance companies don't add anything at all to the experience. You pay them money "in case shit happens," and when shit happens, they send out workers whose job it is to fuck you out of the coverage you've been paying for. They don't even make the introductions! In fact, if you go to the wrong doctor, then all the money you've been paying them may as well be flushed down the toilet, because they won't even pay a percent.

Did you know that a whole bunch of food items don't get taxed (open question, I'm sure you do Zera)? Eggs, milk, bread, most meats... That's because you need food to live, and the government decided way back when that it would be unethical to profit from something essential to life that they themselves had no part in creating. A rare good call for government.

Profit is great, Zera. As you know, I generally take the conservative viewpoint in matters of monies. But health care? Major surgeries are already insanely expensive without adding extra padding, because of course the guy who literally holds your heart in his hands deserves to live damn well for the stress he's under. But to add as much as 400% to the cost in order to pay people who add, literally, nothing to the equation? That's a fucking evil that costs people their lives.

I'll make a profit on damn near anything, brother, but you won't find me telling someone that if they don't pay me 400% more than the item is worth that they have to wander off and die.

All that aside, I'm OK with the public option plan. I personally think that health insurance companies are evil and that they should be destroyed, but I feel the exact same way about the Jonas Brothers, and you don't hear me rallying the troops to make that happen, do ya? A public option would provide competition for the insurance companies, which they have not had, ever. I personally wouldn't want to profit from middle-manning life or death situations, but if someone else does, and they can offer a product that people genuinely want instead of the public option and still make a profit, then mark my words, I'd respect that person as a businessman.

But now? There's nothing to respect in insurance companies, they're corporations that exist for the sole purpose of profiting off of misery. They don't increase the cost of a service by something reasonable, they increase it by an assload. Not just for their profits, but like you said, an average of 5 employees per doctor just to handle their paperwork? I don't know why you're not with me on this, that's beyond unreasonable.

The mere existence of an insurance company has made it so that even people who aren't insured have to pay 2-3 times more than they would have to if insurance companies didn't exist for services that very often make the difference between life and death. How is that not fucking evil?

-----------------------

We're really not going to see eye to eye on a lot of this, because health care is one of the few situations where I don't follow my own rules. I'm an independent, socially liberal and fiscally conservative, that last part meaning that the phrase "tax and spend" is one I don't approve of in damn near every case. This is a case where I do. I genuinely would love to see tax dollars taken from every American to cover health care for every American.

Quote
* If the government is paying, then demand will go through the roof, and our system will not be able to handle the load, and the system will start to resort to massive lines like Canada, Europe has.  1 month is a pretty standard wait for anything in those places, and some of the more rare services are 4-6+ month waits.  Many Canadians, fearing for their lives travel across the border to get these scans, when their abdominal pain, (or other terrifying symptom) doesn't go away, because they fear if they wait 6 months for the scan they desperately need, they'd be dead.

I disagree. Not that you're incorrect that there are waiting lists, I don't even feel like checking the time frames, I believe you... But our hospitals are already over-crowded, with a very decent chunk of the people in them having no health insurance and no money who need emergency care, and get it anyway, which gets paid for by tax dollars (may as well plan on it, no?). It couldn't get that much worse, and so what if it did? Saying that it'll get more crowded than the lucky people who have good health care are used to is just prejudice against the people who haven't been so lucky. "I'm sorry, but including you in the system will just seriously fuck up the lines." is one hell of a rotten excuse for turning away someone who has nothing but a gaping hole in his side from the services that'll save his life.

"We can't afford it" I'm with you on, I seem to remember myself using the same words in no less than half a dozen threads here for all kinds of shit that we passed anyway. Which brings us to:

Quote
One blatant mistake does not justify another.

Agreed, that's not quite what I was saying. What I was saying is closer to "We're already fucked, and if we have to spend dozens of billions because the auto industry is full of whiny pussies who won't reap what they've sown, then I don't see why we don't spend another dozen billion to do something that we as a nation actually needs."

I usually do the "We. Can't. Afford. It." thing, really, on this one point I don't even disagree with you. Wouldn't dream of it. I'm just saying our government doesn't care what we can and can't afford, and since we surely won't stop spending money on stupid shit, it's only fair we spend some money on something worth a shit. If we're going to hemorrhage money, let it at least be for something we can have some pride in.

Honestly, that cliff you're talking about? I think we're already over it. I think we were over it before the wallstreet bailout, and before the auto bailout. Before that shit, I already thought we were about doomed. Still do, we're going to see a real "recession," if not a depression in our life time. We have to, what we've seen so far is nothing. Like you correctly pointed out; Obama's flushing money as fast as ever. That needs to stop. But if I had my way, we'd cut our spending by 80%, pull out of our "conflicts," liquidize the banks that failed along with the auto companies, and institute universal health care.

Our country does a near endless list of stupid shit that drains our budget without providing us any real worth. "Medicare for all?" That's worth something.


Logged


Josh Johnson
joshjohnson@egodriven.net
The "What Men are Really Thinking" Project - A.K.A. the only thing on Egodriven I've paid any attention to whatsoever in years.
"if any of you fuckheads are going to heaven, I'd bet it would be Stinger." - paulsbo
Garr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 513


« Reply #19 on: December 10, 2009, 03:50:33 pm »

Too expensive. I don't want to pay for an alcoholic's liver transplant. I don't want to pay for a drug dealers addictions. I don't want to pay for a whore who constantly gets abortions or gets ravaged by stds. I don't want to pay for someones triple bypass who stilll eats like a slob and runs the risk of a heart attack anyway just by being awake. Let people die if they abuse their bodies.

And there are other ways to make health care "affordable". Allowing people to by insurance premiums across state lines (heard this was illegal for some reason. Probably commerce law), allowing health insurance companies to be not-for-profit. Giving corporate tax breaks to food companies that produce products that promote a healthy life style.

Logged

BOOM! DETECTIVE MICHAEL SCARN, IM WITH THE FBI! WE KNOW ABOUT THE DIAMONDS, WE HAVE BEEN ON TO YOU FOR MONTHS.
dusty
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3707



« Reply #20 on: December 10, 2009, 05:14:07 pm »

I don't want to pay for someones triple bypass who stilll eats like a slob and runs the risk of a heart attack anyway just by being awake. Let people die if they abuse their bodies.

It's a good thing I have insurance. Clearly Garr wants me dead!
Logged
Ruckus
Tester
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2928



« Reply #21 on: December 10, 2009, 11:27:43 pm »

http://www.calnurses.org/media-center/in-the-news/2009/november/over-2-200-vets-died-for-lack-of-health-insurance-in-2008.html
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to: